Forks Over Knives Comes Real Close to Getting it Right
Posted on September 13th, 2011 by Matt Schoeneberger
… and then they screw it all up.
If I had to sum-up the general message of the movie, it would go something like this with where I agree in blue and where I disagree in red:
Most Western diseases, namely CHD, diabetes and cancer, can be greatly reduced by a large-scale change to our dietary habits from the standard American diet to a whole food plant-only diet.
The movie is largely a commercial for the work of Dr. T. Colin Campbell and Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn, Jr. who both promote a whole food plant-based diet. I will not perform a thorough review of either of their bodies of work. Someone has done a way more awesomer job than I could have critiquing Campbell’s China Study. What I will do is say a few quick things specifically about how the movie was made that you should keep in mind if you decide to watch it.
***UPDATE*** 9/23: Denise Minger (the ‘someone’ I mentioned above) wrote a much longer, much more in-depth review here.
First, it’s a documentary and it follows the common new documentary process: Some sciencey talk, the filmmaker’s personal success or experience, some other testimonials and heart string tugging stuff, cool animations that make it easy for you to understand complex statistics or complicated physiological processes in a way that is inaccurate or misleading, and hefty dose of bias. Oh, and don’t forget about “the man” in whatever form – big government, big pharma,etc.
The most egregious (that one is for Jeff – he likes that word) offense is when presenting the outcomes of Dr. Campbell’s work regarding casein protein (found in dairy) and cancer. In short, expose rats to aflatoxin (a carcinogen). Then feed them either 20% or 5% casein protein. The 20% group develops cancer, the 5% group not as much. The conclusion is supposedly that casein causes cancer, or at least allows it to flourish in the presence of carcinogens. Instead of leaving it there, the filmmakers then switch the term from “casein protein” to “animal protein” and show piles of meat on a grill while still talking cancer…
Listen up. You can’t do that. Casein is only found in dairy and those studies’ conclusions cannot be extrapolated to all animal protein. Period. Using science improperly to mislead your audience should be punishable by 30 Gibbs-style smacks upside the head.
We’re given a false dichotomy: Western Diet or Plant-Based Diet. Such is not the case. What makes it worse is that the definition of the Western diet changes suddenly, one second referring to cake and donuts and the next about animal products. Like when Dr. Pam Popper is speaking about changing her health destiny:
“My diet was pretty abominable. I thought the two principle food groups were caffeine and sugar.”
What the hell does that have to do with animal foods? How about the story of Evelyn Oswick, who says
“(I) ate all the chocolate candy I could eat. Ate every donut I could get my hands on. Oh I just loved things like that. A lot of gravy.”
Mmmmm. Meat donuts? You can’t point to a few people, or an entire nation of people, who have the problems associated with a variety of poor nutritional habits and lump it under one name (Western diet) and then paint that name with animal blood. 30 more head smacks!
I promised myself I wouldn’t spend too much time on this because I could go step by step through the movie and give my two cents. It just kills me to see a film come so close to a good answer to a very serious problem, and then take a hard right turn into Propagandaville.
If you found this post informative, check out our book




[...] possibly eat, and an egg is exactly the same as a bag of Cheetos. A recent pingback led me to this review at DoingSpeed.com (it’s not what you think), which nicely sums up the movie’s flip-flopping description [...]
[...] possibly eat, and an egg is exactly the same as a bag of Cheetos. A recent pingback led me to this review at DoingSpeed.com (it’s not what you think), which nicely sums up the movie’s flip-flopping description [...]
Doesn’t this Matt guy know that Denise Minger doesn’t really exist? She was made up by those Westin A Price people. Satan made them do it, so we’d eat more meat.
LOL @ Mark
The flaw in the casein study is even worse than what you exposed here. The 5% casein rats developed less cancers because they almost all died before they could look. So the choice was eat poison+few protein and die quickly or eat poison+adequate protein and die slowly. Chris Masterjohn’s rebuttal of Colin Campbell is imho better than Denise’ (they are not mutually exclusive as they do not handle the same subject).
gallier2, I haven’t read CM’s rebuttal of Campbell’s but I’ll have to look it over. Thanks!